Super Mario Question Mark Template

MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY 2011

Dear Readers: We

and five years, writing in this blog, to all who follow us, thank you for joining us on this journey.

Until this year we had not suffered so much regression in rights and freedoms granted by the current welfare state.

With our proposal for funding of basic income, this is the solidarity of those who consume for those who can not consume. Mal

despite us, deep down we are all consumers. These days

likely consumer par excellence, is sad to see how people can not consume because they have no income.

is therefore necessary to dignify a basic income to the person and make a free person.

Hoping that solidarity is present, from this page editorial team wishes you



A MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY 2011

2005 Elantra Cooling Problem

JOHN BROW AND BASIC INCOME

Normal

This letter, which we then has been published in rebellion.

http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=118412

Greetings

José

Miguel

(As a premise, it is difficult to translate the first part of the title of this article. It is a slogan of the last French movement against the regressive reform of the pension system imposed by Sarkozy. This is an untranslatable play on words around the term "lutte" that can be a verb or a noun. So "Je lutte of classes" means "I struggle of classes" or "I class struggle." One possible interpretation among many, is that in one case, the subject is assumed to be the subject of class struggle, on the other, as a subject divided by the class struggle itself.)

Open Letter to Salvador López Arnal

Dear Salvador: I do not think there is anything that so take it to the tremendous, so personally and passionately. I do not think that you should feel disgraced by my words, not have to threaten to move in one of your mysterious "edges." It is better to consider calmly and mutual benevolence some of the reasons for the tremendous impotence of the traditional left to the crisis and the onslaught of ongoing capital. This really is serious stuff, not the good or the bad name of one or another organization. An organization is a political instrument, a good communist organization a good instrument of class struggle for communism. Poor organization by contrast, is an organization unable to act on the reality found prey to internal and external fabric of relationships and interests that are neutralized or even serve to contravene the supposed causes persecution.
This tissue of interest and relationships are expressed in a particular ideological discourse. In the case that concerns us, I mean the ideological discourse that I call "work." Perhaps the term is not very well chosen, and is almost an Italian, but I think that is well understood that designates the central character played by "work" (Latin for "work") and the identity and dignity of the worker thinking and practice of some organizations and, more specifically, at least in Western Europe,

organizations mainstream political and trade union claiming to represent the working class.

These and no other organizations are the famous "social democrats and Stalinists Eurocommunists." For all the work is unsurpassable horizon of the human condition, to the extent that
its fundamental claim is, at this stage, the establishment of full employment and recovery of the welfare state. The fact that the emphasis on these two issues has not prevented at least the dismantling of the welfare state and the massive loss of jobs should have been left to reflect on this, but these facts do not seem to upset her stubborn. happens that, although this type of union and political organizations could obtain significant gains in the dual situation of Fordism / Keynesianism and the Cold War, today, once settled the "socialist" and Fordist modes of regulation and Keynesian The collective representation of the work has been simply impossible. Today, what we found is not a factory worker with a permanent contract and a collectively bargained rights framework and recognized by a state regulator and planner, a worker who works with a time of work and a workplace defined, but with a burst of work and forms of contractualism: the unemployed, the pizza delivery worker or "call center, "the worker" flexible "of the ETT, the growing number of workers" affected "caring for the elderly, sick, etc, social workers, the portals types of intellectual work from video game producers whose hours of work / play no limit to researchers or academics funded directly by the capital, or even the very air traffic controllers or conference interpreters. All this, without forgetting the fundamental category of workers in a "society of spectacle" are artists and other workers in the show. The representation of this reality is not accessible to the traditional organizations, more or less succeeded in a very precise moment represent the abstract and negotiate the welfare state is that it is simply impossible. The work does not follow the units place, time and courage that defined him before, but has become an increasingly widespread activity, a productive activity every time and place, a real social work. This does not mean that there is no class struggle, but today less than ever can be represented this class struggle as a clash between two sides already in existence. As stated Louis Althusser,
"class struggle is before classes" and constituted and reproduced as such.


We have to leave the football metaphor of the two existing factions. One divides into two (or more). Today the class struggle through macrophysical at the whole society and microphysical level all its molecules and atoms: from political organizations and other state apparatus to individuals and their relationships. Various categories of workers are so very different scenarios forms of class struggle can not be represented in a unified way, though, if the fight against capitalism, should find ways of horizontal articulation we have not yet been developed. Before the discovery of the labor movement basic weapon, the strike took decades to find and name it as a consistent practice, before he was tempted to break the machine or kill the bosses.

Today, we face a similar stage to those initial moments of the industrial working class: we must invent new forms of resistance to articulate the forces necessary to block the entire diffuse social production, since traditional strike, except in countries where the industrial working class has a great weight as China or Germany, is remembered as cynically

Sarkozy

"invisible." Only the universal general strike, a metropolitan strike blocking the flow of communication and transportation can be visible and harmful to the capital. Today

not think I have much appeal to eco factory work as an element of dignity of any individual in our society, insisting, for example, as you do in
your article on the drivers
published in Rebellion, in "When workers go on strike they do not work but to do so with dignity. Aspiring to be treated as human beings, not as parts of a machine evil and unjust." For many, it is no longer being exploited (working) in a "dignified" or "human" but not to work under an employer (or state) and for capital. Diffuse social work has the advantage of showing millions of people daily to perfect uselessness of productive capital and its state. The capital is now entirely parasitic and the state is a limit to the capital, but the last of their strongholds. Hence, the current revival of Marx-Kantian neo-socialist discourse of upholding the rule of law as a defender of society against the capital can only lead to an impasse. The limit of "Labour" is its inability to think the latent desire for communism in our societies, because they always have to transcribe it into categories "socialist" state management fixed capital (capital invested in means of production except labor force) and variable (capital invested in labor force: the only commodity that generates new value or goodwill). Not pay out the horizon, claims related to employment (at least in the CES as unions CCOO and UGT) growth, is prohibited from condemning himself and others out any prospect of wage status of class society and the state. So, to start naming names, as I asked, Izquierda Unida, respectively defends its in your
program
the last European elections and its the program 2008 general full employment and growth (sustainable): "For IU, also at the decision of the European institutions, policies that encourage job creation are fundamental objective "(European)," The objectives of monetary policy should be expanded, including with price stability, growth and full employment, quality insurance. " (General). These goals, "Labour" coincides with the PSOE in its 2008 election program says something today as surreal as the following: bring our economy full employment and improve job quality and stability, wage growth, equality at work and reconciling work and family life. " With these objectives is difficult if not impossible, to come into contact with new types of worker integrated into the "diffuse social work." The objectives of these workers are not full, they know can not and do not consider desirable, but an independent citizen's income any provision
's employment, free access common to production, which is the other name-communist freedom to undertake an effective, free access to public goods such as health and education and progressive social management of these assets outside the capital and the state.
All are targets

transition to a society without classes and wage slavery.

None of them is set in the programs of the Labour left. In other words, to quote the manifesto: "The Communists have no game." I do not think that today the party is useful or necessary, it is too tied to the logic of representation. We have to think about something else: I cordially invite you to do so. A hug John Brown

Which Hardwood Is The Softest

Dear Readers:

This week I offer some reflections of Ramiro Pinto. Recently published on his personal blog

http://ramiropinto.es/2010/11/15/ideas-de-justicia/ \u200b\u200b

Greetings

ideas of justice.

's book

Amartya Sen " The ideas of justice "leads to a reflection that the author comes close, but fails completely to it. It is in the description of facts, which clearly defined, but we must join another of his books: " Reconsideration equality", which asks Equality of What ? .

An example that Sen puts it is very dramatic. Presents us there are three children and a flute, to which we give them?. One says he's The only one who can play. Another is poor and he is the only one not have toys. And the third says that it is those who have it.

We can argue whether those who have it have the right to have your own, but we think that just made another one can do that better than anything else is poor, but better to know how to use that, otherwise why want it?, etc. We will believe we defend what we think is more fair, when we do is defend our idea of \u200b\u200bjustice and our mentality.

Therefore be analyzed whose idea of \u200b\u200bjustice must be applied at all times. why Amartya Sen

intends to apply reason to understand justice, especially social justice, aiming, aims to eliminate poverty. This requires different solutions, depending on when you want to apply and the status of a particular group and society in general.

Many times in these discussions about what should be social justice fall in positions that pose different languages. The book includes a reflection on the philosophy of language, wondering what are the logical forms?.

Sen tries to overcome what the political philosopher, Jerry Cohen calls "illusions objective" those ideas that are generally utopian to believe, often collectively, "our understanding of the outside world is anchored on our experiences and our thinking. "

This is what happens in the current economic thinking so that changing the reality we anchored in yesterday's solutions do not work. We need a change of mentalities

d. And as indicated by Jon Elster act from sufficient reasons. Otherwise we are falling into what Herbert Simon called bounded rationality . "

The conclusion

Sen is that different approaches are needed to understand the various theories of justice. So if we link it with his theory of poverty we see that makes an innovative approach, critical of the ideas of John Ralws , being poor considering the lack of developing individual capacities. Which opens a framework as to the basis of equality and freedom as the foundations of social policy and development practice of justice soci al. It goes beyond lack of income, but it binds to the lack of substantive liberty.

ago a very interesting analysis on the relationship between economic development and democratic models, explaining that freedom is a guarantor of economic development. When democracy works from the corruption institicionalizada

affects economic development.

The issue is to implement all these ideas in new patterns of economic thought for example to achieve an equal basis, allowing

democratize the economy , which Gieger López Garrido defended while leading the New Left Party and seems to have forgotten to take institutional positions .

is why I think that fits these innovative ideas Basic Income,

which is simply a measure that serves as a support for the adaptation process of the economy to the new reality defined by globalization, technological progress, the financial strength of the economy against the production, and the imperative of achieving a sustainable development , which has caused the states to sign the Kyoto protocol without anyone met because of the need to create jobs. Such as keeping the coal mining, the form of subsidies, making it impossible to reduce emissions of CO2.

However, the ideas trapped in inertia have been awarded the 2010 Nobel laureate in economics, Americans Peter A.

Diamond

, Dale T. Mortensen and British Cypriot Christopher A. Pissarides, unemployment scholars, who advocate a greater intensity of active employment policies. Or argue that subsidies do increase unemployment, which is sufficient to analyze the large number of unemployed without coverage, nor found a job. This award indicates to us where they will go for the shots of the economic policies of the next few months, then the result will not give to look for other formulas. not examine environmental consequences of their "solutions."

They ask these Nobel Prize in economics how is it that so many people out of work while there jobs?. Propose to redefine unemployment coverage, so as to exert pressure on people to accept any job and in any condition, instead of seeing it will be necessary to adjust the wage offer to the needs and requirements of the job application.

wants to justify is that lack of training is not finding work, which is not true, but serves to justify training courses useless most of the time and require many hours of unpaid work was considered "training practices", which remove the unemployed from the unemployment lists and play well with the statistics. Something they have accepted the majority indicato s

.

We raise anchor in our minds, renew

economic thinking and move forward booming plain sailing ... would say our beloved poet José de Espronceda Extremadura. Ramiro Pinto

Clean A White G Shock

IDEAS OF JUSTICE EUROPEAN GOVERNMENT OR LACK OF SOLIDARITY

Normal

The current government, This makes tax relief for SMEs by reducing the tax rate of these, to extend the reduced section.

the first installment shall be increased from 120,000 to 300,000 euros profit. http://www.elmundo.es/mundodinero/2010/12/01/economia/1291192259.html

In consideration

tax relief for SMEs is deleted the 426 Euros for the unemployed, just as the Bank of Spain in a study says that 40% of the unemployed live in households where nobody works.

http://www.diariodeleon.es/noticias/noticia.asp?pkid=569215

solidarity As a postscript to the government, was privatized AENA, which has led to a strike by drivers.

http://luisacuerda.blogspot.com/

A good manager sells the few companies with profits and stays with that bear losses.

The truth is that headlines to discourage anyone, and as discussed in this blog, there are days that end with hope.

http://www.rankia.com/blog/nuevasreglaseconomia/616698-hay-dias-que-acaban-esperanza

For those who want to learn what's really going on,

http: / / www.rankia.com/blog/nuevasreglaseconomia/618701-controladores-cortina-humo-para-atraco-siglo

course solidarity with the wealthy government is outrageous. Pity not equal to the unemployed.

http://www.rankia.com/blog/nuevasreglaseconomia/603375-otra-facturita-para-fomento-bueno-nosotros

a greeting

Extra Absorbent Tampons

INTERESTED

Normal

The press is justifying the crisis, before the attack on sovereign debt, an attack that happened to coincide with the QE2 from the Fed. words, this attack coincides in time, when the Fed injects money to entities, it must invest to not devalue the money they received.

Looking

best interests and do not hesitate to attack the states through the press, so that while an improvement of the benefits justify the dismantling of the welfare state.

proposal also suggest you that I do ENRIC CANTON,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX4B4bMnOEU&feature=player_embedded

proposal is December 7th withdraw all the money in the banks.

'll leave you with this great statement of ATTAC, the text share.

Reality

against incompetent decision-makers in the European Union

Source: http://www.attac.es/realidad-contra-incompetencia-de-responsables-economicos-en-la -European-union /

Speculators are complicit criminals and private business leaders and the public ruin robbing the welfare state

ATTAC Spain Press

After the painful and required by payers of European Commission "rescue of Ireland international speculators have stepped away to calm down the attacks against Portugal and Spain. Contagion has accelerated. As the doctors who make mistakes in diagnosis away from healing the sick accelerate his death.

The 22 pm was pathetic to hear the answers market fundamentalists, and the Minister Elena Salgado own night interviewed on a television, improvised told reporters that faced the reverse reaction to expected and They announced the "markets" to the rescue of Ireland. The response of

Governor of the Bank of Spain

this morning, November 23, calling the reaction to "accelerate the reform" is just grotesque criminal. Spain is not Ireland. Nor was Greece. But neither Ireland nor Greece was not thereby be saved. Neither Portugal nor Spain will do if you follow these fundamentalist neo-liberal policies wrong.

In Greece opaque and secret association offense of Goldman Sachs with the previous Conservative government defrauded the Greek and European citizenship, with the complicit help of the French and German private bank. The rescue articulated by European funds has been to ensure the collection of funds to these German and French banks, while Goldman Sachs and former politicians are free and without charge to enjoy their loot. The correct answer

passed and passes first through impute to these parties and issue an order to hunt for their crimes for trial, and second by not acknowledge the debt and demand the previous audit for sanearla and recognize only right and, third from put the social interests of the Greeks to the interests of the international private banking reconsidering budgets and purchase commitments made as the new submarines to Germany. In Ireland

current Conservative government nationalized the losses of their friends

members of the Governing Body of the Irish private banks, state doomed to bankruptcy, skipping the EU's own rules, that if when "we had to take a break in capitalism "and the Commission was looking for another site. Now the government resigns and is ready to live well protected by his friends saved, while Irish citizenship will they transfer the cost, the same who recently harassed in a referendum to ratify the Lisbon Treaty neoliberal its irrational Title III today ties their hands and feet making them impossible to defend. The bailout announced is aimed at saving the private banking interests of Britain, whose country outside the euro area does not hesitate to "solidarity" in the public bailout that belong to citizens of his "gracious majesty" . there are also plenty of reasons to try crimes of the current rulers and members of the Board of Directors of private banks. A refuse to pay the debt without a prior audit and put the interests of citizens to spurious speculators market fundamentalists who lied and deceived us. Today countries integrate the European Union have more resources than in 1945 , when central Europe was destroyed, no savings, industry or reservations. Then they built the welfare state because it prioritized the common interest community and the private productive economy that meets the social needs of the interest of speculators who are normatively regulated by controlling the State any movement of capital. Now that we can always return to the communal and social priority over the individual interest of a small group of speculators.

The real output and ultimately to the crisis in citizenship exists, it is possible and is within our possibilities , but necessarily has to move towards disarmament of international speculators and financial system regulation. Will get no giving in, trying to "calm the markets" but faced them, seeing them as what they are: enemies

citizenship.

This response must be on other rules with

establishment of a Financial Transaction Tax

throughout the European Union or, at least in the euro area which is the current target of speculators; reducing social inequalities and more equitable redistribution of wealth Public Bank to ensure credit flow to small businesses and families ; and subordination of trade to social and environmental standards recovering lost food sovereignty. them to justice are incompatible with the current rules of the European Union and international financial institutions. why is it necessary to repeal Title III of the present Lisbon Treaty, and move decisively to build the political and social Europe without which no economy can survive.

From ATTAC Spain we call attention to the fact that the European Trade Union Confederation has called for the next 15-18 December European action against the plans set by the Commission and the flawed neoliberal fundamentalism of his economic proposals. This is the response and we are faced with the irrational and suicidal derived from the current system. We must not fall into the distraction maneuvers and strategy to dilute the blow which inevitably will receive from the public. Your time is over.