Crash of 2010?, Crisis?, Do I stop?. v \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} o \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} w \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);}. shape {behavior: url (# default # VML);}
never provide solutions. When you say some always in relation to employment, ie to the same criticism of the crisis are crisis, a word that means change .
The characteristics of this crisis is that society as a whole stands before a paradigm shift is necessary
. It's a step that must be taken, especially at the level of thought, but a lot of inertia and the interests of those who are enriched by the crisis and, above all, of those who wield power in this system in place: money as a corruptor policy. A change would transform the game and could lose power. For this reason the crisis is tight, no solutions are discussed.
politicians interpret a set of promises that are forgotten, but serve to generate encouraging news. Proposes measures that never work and pursue them millions of euros that enrich a few entrepreneurs.
Society has evolved into non-violent forms of change, or at least not as violent as before, but you can cross the threshold of the collective need and trigger a violent outburst difficult to predict and throughout to control once it has started. Hence the need for a vision of reality that allows us to develop our capabilities and leverage the technological and scientific potential more freedom and no more slaves.
Santiago Niño Becerra
, professor of economic structure of the University Ramon Llull, poses and in his book "The crash of 2010," which is a systemic crisis, " systemic crisis " , which indeed it is, but at the same time the progress of technology puts us in a crisis in another, as this is a downturn in the history of our civilization, it also what is the economy itself, same as production goods and their distribution. Remain the same mechanisms of yesteryear when the material reality has changed. If a diagnosis is not clear and accurate measures inevitably fail.
While not developed a set of proposals with this in mind, it will be impossible to get out of this crisis, to undertake the necessary change. Which inevitably drags an
crisis of ideas, otrosí affecting the political left, which is not able to change their concepts in line with the new reality.
employment is continuing to call, followed by economic policies in terms of employment, when what we live is a
employment crisis , which affects our way of life, whole mentality that demands that have financial reward can only be in relation to employment, as well as pay for work, having worked as a pension, or disability to work. This model has reached its last fin.Los economic studies indicate there may be economic growth, but unemployment to fall and might even increase. A curious paradox is telling us that we live in another reality that we must adapt.
Becerra In his book Child of a quote from
Jeremy Rifkin, which was later set aside, but it is significant: " This s . XX less than 5% of the population produce the goods and services consumed by the rest, so no need for a massive workforce " . But throughout the book is not any proposal to allow out of this situation. It takes a fulcrum on which to recover the social mobilization.
In the book
Becerra Niño makes a good presentation and analysis of the current situation, following the evolution of many years ago of the economy. Her final prophecy announces plummeting middle of this year, the 2010 crash, has not left as is, but we are in a fall unchecked. However can stay in a state of permanent decline because it has no bottom . Or we can see that the model has bottomed, but this fund continues to fall, rising unemployment, without being able to solve. For That is why I talk about employment crisis.
can not create more jobs
, because it would seriously affect the destruction of nature, climate change reinforces the . Never been taken into account this environmental factor in the economy, but now in an extreme situation because it affects huge economic consequences, so that the increased workload would lose a lot of money and human losses as with major disasters increasingly frequent and affecting a greater number of people.
Given the money that blinds the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2010, Mario Molina
, warns: "The planet survives, but if we do nothing in twenty years may be virtually irreversible changes."
not compare the 1929 crisis with the present, because that was a crisis in which there were not enough goods, products and goods, because they are paralyzed as a result of investment and productivity. The model was blocked because the money ceased to have value to break the balance between supply and demand. But today there are people who lack the means to buy without missing anything in the markets, even financial. The crisis of 1929 and the crisis of 2010 have been distribution. The first was resolved by creating jobs through economic growth. The present can only be resolved through the introduction of a Basic Income
.
The
globalization and technology do you have enough supply, which do not reach those without resources which are linked to employment. And it is Here lies the rub the crisis . There will be an economic downturn can not be any, because the productive machinery works too well. What we have is a situation of necessity in a growing percentage of the population unemployed and a restriction of rights and wages to workers, precisely on the grounds of the crisis, when that is precisely what generates it. In fact what we believe are the consequences of the crisis are the causes, because they define the new reality.
The precariousness of work, a labor reform that favors the dismissal, which increases the retirement age is not due to a crisis, but is doing that which creates it gets worse. Investors to be constrained in their ability to stop investing benefit to force the government measures against the working class, the media warn of the crisis and to "get" her say no choice but to make a policy restricting the rights of workers. It's a farce.
There are now enough wealth so that there needs worldwide global, and in each individual nation.
The question is how to organize the wealth in society . At the Millennium Summit, 21 - IX - 2010, the prime minister of Spain, Rodriguez Zapatero , called for financial transactions are taxed to eradicate hunger. Which is a fallacy and total lie , because without this fee can be eliminated where property and wealth enough to do and not done. With these rates have more money, which was used for luxuries, for more trains high speed, more highways, a helicopter for each deputy, etc. It is known that wealth creation depends on the laws of the market, but the distribution of policy measures that he has taken, or other rulers either.
Call
crisis is an assembly that is used as an excuse to get benefits from the economic power of political collusion to keep. In this sense and Daniel Cohen in his book "Our modern times, "stresses that fighting unemployment, currently, is only possible by fighting inequalities. The 2010 crisis is the separation of the increasing wealth and increasing poverty. This requires a series of fiscal measures for large profits, the economy end the corruption that makes the public funds are drained by corporate profits rather than wages, and a measure that allows an independent income from employment: Basic Income.
is important to expose the economy corruption, something the studios and universities do not study, as though the economy to function with its errors and faults, but so immaculate. Corruption is an essential element of the crisis and economic policies are targeted by this scam that lead.
This really is a lesson to be drawn from
crash of 1929 , which is not usually analyzed. This had much to do Prohibition, which was established in the U.S., 1920. There was a huge increase in gangs and black market that made it work with a black money growing strength. To the point of establishing a parallel economy of money that passes through the Treasury and invests and flowing out of state control. was becoming increasingly black money will not invest in the productive economy, which consumes only and does not pay the taxes.
For all that in 1931 Al Capone was arrested for tax evasion, having directed many crimes, but could not prove to the courts. spent several months in prison two years ago by finding a concealed weapon. They had to change from prison to prevent further driving the business of the mafia. Prohibition ended in 1933, allowing a process of economic recovery and avoid the problems of alcoholism campaigns and educating the youth in this regard.
is important to this analysis in mind to understand the nature of our crisis, which is more looting in the economy
of corruption, in which the public money has gone to corporate profits rather than wages. As public money has to go to work public, not private profit-hungry business. For this reason it is not possible to resolve the crisis through public support, which have served for some years when there was an expansion of the economy, which led to the economic culture of the pitch.
There are two insurmountable brakes to economic growth are energy resources and raw materials are limited, no more. And nature is threatened by water pollution and air pollution, the destruction of physical space to occupy by urban sprawl, large reservoirs, open pit mining, which involves the disappearance of animal species, plants and a change in the ecological balance to which the human species has adapted over centuries. Even though not affecting the destruction of nature comes a time when most buildings do not fit, no more highways and economic growth slows. No benefits. No investment. There are no employment contracts.
find another axis of the current crisis, the idea of \u200b\u200bthe work to be a means to achieve the transformation of the environment has become an end in itself. But also has assumed the work as something that is inoculated predominant in the minds of people, so that one model or another work is the central element of the proposals when this crisis is the element that must be overcome and society to think differently, to exit the collapse we are.
In his book "The End of Work"
Jeremy Rifkin says, "Civilization is built around the concept of work." Overcoming the crisis requires action at the level of civilization. Otherwise global violence is something that can be triggered brutal that affect the lives of thousands of millions of people.
We see that unions are not able to order measures for the unemployed than ask for more jobs, that they are not, they are not needed. Economic policies are established in order to create job and fail or seriously risk the population with the destruction of the environment.
An example is
miners , to which their companies do not pay, after the government has spent a lot of money that has not kept wages, but business profits, and protest for the retention of European funds to subsidize the coal, that thermals do not buy. And I have to buy the government. Jobs go as well as expensive and produced in the combustion process produces CO2, which contributes to climate change and the English government has to pay a share of CO2 emissions for failing to reduce emissions. It makes no sense, but it is a theater to push media to maintain subsidies. You have to pay them what they should, but that there is justice so requires. Or the expropriation of the mines and nationalization, but not done because there are many economic interests of supporters that have to do with political parties.
miners work is a maximum effort. The company would not object to draw a salary without going to work, but did not enter his head, let the unions. Meanwhile there is no money for the unemployed who did not receive benefits, but what if it is to keep this business ruinous to the nation?. Theatrical media pressure from seeing this reality. Re-industrialization policies fail one after another because what does it produce?. Would at best give some to get it out to others. Recently, the English prime minister has inaugurated an airport terminal with a capacity of use is less than 20% of capacity. It has spent public money on a useless project, which also generates an annual deficit, money is not there?
. Another example: in the Lion City for a month are deleted extraexcolares class sporting and cultural rights, municipal School of Music and the Restoration, to save money. At the same time spend 150,000 euros to place a sculpture of flies that spoil the aesthetics of a square, which has meant a rejection neighborhood and yes there is money for this, or is there no money? .
According Rifkin
"technological progress increases the production affected millions of workers. Clinging to an old economic paradigm can be disastrous and even dangerous for a twenty-first century civilization. " proposes a Guaranteed Income to who is unemployed, unconditionally, that is how they first called what is now known as Basic Income.
As an urgent measure is to guarantee a basic income
the unemployed, to enable their survival, to further establish universally to all citizens by generating a new economic model that guarantees and sustainable development. This requires a series of fiscal measures and budget adjustments to avoid jobs that accrete financial viability and are not efficient, so as to establish a basis of equality in an economy with a principle of equity, which is not means that it will be in full, but at least avoid the problem of poverty, despair and cut to threaten workers and force them to accept unfair and humiliating working conditions.
This time to end the crisis have to leave the door model and it is the Basic Income.
remember a few lines from Walt Whitman
: You by lowering the people
you, liars watch out!
nor legal theft in its various
and thousands ways in which mock the poor
to stay with his salary
or by so many promises that have sprung from royal lips
to be broken with a laugh.
RAMIRO PINTO
Normal 
Normal