What are these measures of adjustment?, Development and splendor of the economics of corruption. Something that is entrenched in a false democracy, since the ruling party and the opposition do the same once they achieve power, but say different things in the electoral drama and media. It is the dictatorship
bipartisanship, something to uncover and fight against such tyranny.
Keynesian policies are applied outside its context and as a trap to organize a scam at the state level. Merge the free-market practices with public investment in
strategic neoliberalism in which politicians and government technical act of scammers.
Do not you realize ....?
public money is spent, but this is to create jobs must be through public employment, but not establishing a business that is unprecedented
hire private companies. More than half the budget of the works they will do will benefit under the euphemism of "business management" .
consists of a
transfer of public money to private profit. Then these companies give a portion of her winnings to the party campaigns on the part of the thanks that circulate in these operations, which are structured as a model of corruption State.
A payroll reaches a small portion of public investment as the costs of materials are also purchased from private companies, generating profits
scale. Already in the 30's of last century in his book "The Doktor Faustus, Thomas Mann writes:" The construction of many buildings served to enrich absurd than a few builders and decorators , managed to transform the madness good business . " In another work, "L to mountain magic "warns:" The work has become an absolute value. " And it seems we have learned.
affects a network that it masks, ranging from the university community who are unable to report such practices, trade unions, parties of power, and facility managers who do nothing to prevent this ongoing robbery. For them there is no crisis. They make grandiose statements, but they who are moved
there is increasing unemployment and fewer benefits .
Those who maintain this model are essentially corrupt party bureaucrats, who work in the same salary, without other merit than what they choose to unconditionally defend strategists. They have become mercenaries, which are placed in institutions and in positions to carry out the exercise of power. That the party promises one thing, defending something that comes out of a conference but then say or otherwise do not care. They only care receivables. The ideas and people bring them carelessly.
I recently talked to a politician who holds a position, I reminded him that he was defending a couple of years earlier vehemently criticized. There was no argument for its part, just that he has a family and have to maintain clear that "stay" is to have all kinds of luxuries.
says there is money and make lavish works, such as a tram in Leon that people want mostly to be in deficit every year, which will have to pay citizens to a private company. When the same function can be done with electric buses with 5% of that budget. Is there no money?.
is not for the unemployed, the poor, but for millions in advertising campaigns that serve only to contract with public money to private marketing companies which fattens the budget and then will the party's election campaign that has contracted through an institution. It is in these procurement practices which makes financial and fiscal engineering.
many useless works are done with the excuse to maintain or create jobs!. Something that nothing matters. What is the coverage of unemployed without benefits?. Yet public money is used to generate profits for big business. That is what worries them. The economic tyranny
works this way. Which is necessary to unmask. Because in a time of crisis public money will only have effect on employment when the public is , and that corporate profits are not invested in expanding the business and increase production, but used in financial economics to make money and get even richer.
bleeding me give an example. In the late 70's and early 80 English social democracy had to operate by itself. team
Willy Brandt, who until 1987 was president of the German Social Democratic Party, proposed them to be politically necessary money. The right has its own support. They had to do the same, apart from the ideas. The important thing was to get power.
a strategy was established under the name "
companies capitalize ", which could help them in their campaigns. Public works was to make no sense, against all criteria of sustainability and growing. This has worked widely in developed countries and now those in developing countries. Politicians and merchants have brought the planet to the brink of destruction with the serious threat of climate change and society have led to ruin. theft have made to society is what they call crisis.
I'll put an example. During the crisis, no money and a town hall monitors expenditure cuts of music and activities. However, that same council pays € 180,000 in giant vases to ornaments of the city.
Is there money or no money? . Why choose an expense and not another?. Education of youth is necessary and more in a teaching model with a single day, leaving the afternoon for activities. That has huge vases of colors is not necessary, because you can do without.
Why choose to spend on one thing and not another?
. Because in the case of monitors is spent on salaries for full and monitors for workers. However, with the vases is responsible to a company. Council's budget, with public money, some is for benefits and for "business management". One for a fraction of costs and to pay salaries. The contractor will be grateful and with so much money can give a bonus to the charge of carrying out this "idea" and give money to finance the campaign of the party that governs the municipality, or advertising or something "free", that if elected will continue running errands. "Necessary expenses are avoided because there is a crisis or to make a foray?.
exampleThe council has had to pay to open a trench in the middle of the city for a tram, which then was closed by a court of law, also paying for it. By a decision of the courts will not be the tram in the city center. In an interview after the decision, says he does not know how you will spend that money,?. In works! Finally went to do work in neighborhoods where 5% of this investment could pay those supervising extracurricular activities.
institutions have been indebted to companies in exchange for land grab, impose their criteria for work. But when no more space to build, demand money directly. A municipality to repay its debt sold cheap land that reclassified to a housing estate in the year 2005. After two years in which the flats were not sold easily asked to be paying off the debt they incurred, all construction companies. City Hall demanded money. One councilor said that already met by selling price of the land gift. But as I did them that operation had to counteract the electoral program
on the left and privatized water service (2010).
In 1986 the Social Democratic government of Spain decided to shut down a dam that the cabinet approved the dictatorship in 1963. Decide to continue their work and destroy one of the richest valleys and one of the most important ecosystems in Europe:
After a few years, 9,000 hectares have been irrigated without ever benefiting from the grants for the protection of steppe birds and charge for converting to what were already rainfed cereal. Nothing has spread the project and spend millions of euros to make pipes that are not used. Assuming that the 82,000 hectares regasen planned and will market their produce or two hundred years rentabilizaría such investment. Many farmers do not want this change to irrigation which requires a large investment ys
nly pays to subsidies.
This is the amount of money without counting the cost of the dam and expropriation, only with money for land consolidation, canals and other infrastructure costs and agency on this project would have been more profitable to give each farmer provided 600,000 euros to live in the village. And like many others here, not so dramatic, but under the same scheme.
The objective was to spend millions of euros for the benefit of private companies.
has caught everyone's money to give to a few, when there is no for further investment is said to be a crisis. Where's the money?. Because "h
HayloAberle. We have landed. Deceive us with promises of jobs, as the current president who was elected on the promise of full employment. To operate the economy is necessary to implement the Basic Income . No another remedy, such action could have prevented the crisis.
With the Basic Income
the economy of the people and the investment would be made to create jobs / huge profits, but those that are needed, in the absence of excuses. You must exit the economy of corruption in order to distribute the wealth base of survival.
The current situation of need, people without means to live, has some causes, and above all have some responsibility, who is to speak out and fight for measures to eliminate poverty and raise a different economic model. Going out to make visible the power and thus making you lose your capacity for action and control over people on his conscience, his behavior on his life.
According
Terry Goreld:"We're ruled by psychopaths. They are people without conscience, without heart. To reach the top are only concerned with the profit going to provide power in the form of money, women, big houses, cars. Not dealing with the poor or the unfortunate " . RAMIRO PINTO
