G What Does It Cost To Fill A Cavity?

Normal

Dear Readers: apparently this issue has little to do with the basic income, but perhaps enlighten us a little in the political language and its representation.

seems that one of the most hackneyed arguments for privatization, is the professionalization of the sector and remove politicians from the direction of these entities.

First thing to say is that managers of these entities paid as professionals, and if they are not bad going.

Secondly we must remember how these entities, as a rule

these entities are private companies, usually owned by a foundation and whose benefits are shared between endowments, reserves

and social work.

words, their benefits are invested in society. We could discuss whether to invest right or wrong, but what we should indicate that they are the representatives of that society. About within its Board of Directors (political and social agents several depositors, founding bodies, etc. ..), which decide where to invest. The governor general rule a (professional), good or better regular everyday wear to the institution and propose to the council. What has been achieved with this crisis is the privatization of 50% of the profits of the financial system English thanks to the privatization of banks.

Suddenly politicians seeking the privatization and removal of boxes politicians have realized that if the government takes the political and public places may be that these professionals are not of his party, so did not liked the idea of \u200b\u200bnationalization for the sale of the entities that allegedly

go wrong. We say supposedly because banks do not do better, but they require additional requirements on banks to force them to be banks. and go to market as if the boxes were not already in the market competing with banks, but if there are fewer competitors there will be less competition and more profit.

Is this proposed free trade?

But if the reader thinks that if you privatized these, which, being private entities, these are depoliticized,

we invite you to take a look at the CNMV and look who sit on the board of directors of large construction and electrical IBEX.

may see, like all former politicians and thinkers from various governments as the famous ex-presidents are hired by these companies. As we always say in this blog are socialized while profits were compounded poverty.

A stand that charges 400 Euros will not even provide for the running costs can not work without losing their income.

presidents and senior politicians can match their enormous emonumentos for their great capacity for work.

If those who must manage public assets managed just private interests. do they represent our representatives?

Why not interested in talking about the basic income? Why

when choosing someone to manage a municipality that privatized services, instead of improving efficiency and productivity of what is supposed to manage?

If

who choose to manage the public, sell what is profitable and stay with what is there to lose, Who has to pay for services?

Is this the economy that stand for?

to where we want to, because the problem is not in

the economy, but in whom we represent that do not deliver what they promise in most cases. Greetings

José Miguel