Thursday, March 24, 2011

Invite Wording For A Home Jewelry Party

NO A LA GUERRA NUCLEAR ENERGY

Graphic Libyan exports in 2010


Dear Readers: Since

this page, we solidarity with all the Libyan people for the events that are happening in their territory.

European states have sought for some excuse to intervene riots in that state because of its oil wealth .

regret not defend with the same momentum, Bahrainis, of pakistan, and other dictatorships that kill silently as he has been to Libya.

Violence begets violence, revolt in Egypt was peaceful, all dictators massacring their people, bomb and kill innocent stoop to do what he does and Gaddafi bomb, course is not the solution.

Europe should have used economic pressure, Europe but as we are seeing there, the UN either.

Germany alone has shown wisdom, perhaps because they do not play anything else, would have avoided this season.

We are facing not only the dictatorship capital but an economic dictatorship where human rights do not paint anything. buy the information is lying in order to get economic and strategic objectives.

Since Europe is supporting one side of a civil war aimed at dividing the country and ensure the supply of oil, and this is sold as humanitarian aid.

We can not agree to overthrow a dictatorship with violence. And from my personal point of view can not support these actions.

As a picture is worth a thousand words, attached Libyan exports to the comparéis with those involved in this war.

There are countries where oil revenues will allow citizens a basic income per capita more than double average English income. All that money is in Western banks on behalf of dictators. We can not support dictatorships that massacred his people, if we should not be ethical to accept this money, or sell weapons to these characters. But we put employment and our concern for human rights and that is the problem.





'll leave you with some reflections of a Nobel Peace Prize

Pérez Esquivel: "What interests the U.S., Britain and France is to take the oil"

The Nobel Peace Prize, Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, reflected this morning of the attack allied forces engaged in Libya. Said it was an "unnecessary war," lamented that the UN is subject to the five big powers "to do what they want and not what" should "and pointed to Barack Obama for failing to comply with any of his campaign promises.

declraciones program in "Two types bold" in LT8, afitmó: "When you do a closer reading, is that what interests the United States, Britain and France is to take over oil resources. So have done in Iraq. I've been 12 days and saw the disaster and death that have caused these countries haras of an alleged democratization. "

"One wonders how a person like Kaddhafi has been in government for 42 years," he added. It is clear that only he could do because these countries were partners. Currently there are more interested in, then look to build on it. " And ventured

that the next war will be against Iran "and for the same purpose: to control oil resources in that country. "Unfortunately the media hide the truth of what is happening and give us a false picture of the situation in the Middle East, so what happens in Libya as what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan."

Esquivel noted that the arguments put forward by the powers to go to the Middle East, are all lies. And he said directly to the president of the United States to disengage from the promises made to stop war and human rights violation. "Unfortunately this person was expected other conduct, but one comporende one thing is to get the government and another to power. "

In this regard, said Obama's role is even more questionable for being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 "for his vision of a world without weapons." "When Obama gave what I sent him a letter. I said, was a surprise to everyone that have given you the peace prize, so now you have it you must be consistent from what the peace prize and policies to implement. Of those promises did not meet any: ending the war in Afghanistan, close the Guantanamo prison, and try to find a solution for peace in the Middle East and none of that happened, things have worsened. "

"The facts are showing. If at all this time that the government was unable to advance in one of these campaign promises we have the situation in the world. We will have to keep working and trying to avoid further damage," said .

also questioned the actions of United Nations Organization (UNO). "The other important note is that under pressure the United Nations sought to support this invasion, is an organization that has lost all credibility, has lost his way because he has to preserve peace and not to promote war and unfortunately we are about United Nations under the five major powers who do they want and not what they owe. "

In 1980 he received the Nobel Peace Prize for his commitment to defending human rights in Latin America.


As

D. Ramiro Pinto says on its website:

Why the attack?. You can not make it by repression, because these conditions occur in Yemen, Syria, Israel, the Saharawi people. We see that if an arms embargo on Libyan state can not reach this country, all the same to buy them or not. And l or have done is first lien accounts Libyan state and the fortunes of this country. It seems that had begun to sense that the Libyan government was taking over 32,000,000,000 dollars, probably more , three U.S. banks, one English, two Italian and two French. In Spain had paralyzed large urban projects, the crisis or whatever. The tracking of this money was that was happening to other monetary systems, the ruble and the yuan. It seems that the new country is the money and not going to acquiesce. If they had, within the freedom of capital movements and the free market funds, had bankrupted not only banks, but those countries that have entered into bankruptcy.


Within the mobilization of the Arab world, who have been preparing U.S., with Israel and support in Europe for years, to ensure the stability of these countries with controlled democracies or tyrannies friends, is Israel seeks stability and disposition of oil at affordable prices. Came time to settle accounts with the Gadhafi regime for r ethene their bank accounts and seize its vast capital, pinning him to keep him out. With the intervention will be more deaths, do not care. It's going to escalate the conflict. They do not care. Only interested in money . The end justifies the means, including war. And anti-war groups have been duped, left, fixed public opinion not to war with a performance of humanitarian intervention is not true. The power of the media has created a pressure from the media capable of generating a psychological influence, if favorable to military intervention, camouflaged in the speeches of freedom, democracy and resolutions that are not even respected.

www.ramiropinto.es


0 comments:

Post a Comment